Newsroom > In Our Words > Retroactivity Revisited: Has Anything Changed?
April 21, 2015

Retroactivity Revisited: Has Anything Changed?

Written By

by Erica Horn, Maddie Schueler & Gregory Nowak

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Carlton turned 20 last year, but the core issue within the case remains embattled. In this article, authors Erica Horn, Maddie Schueler and Gregory Nowak discuss the Carlton decision and several 2014 cases on which it had an impact.

Related Articles

View More
April 16, 2024
New Indiana Law Will End Ban on “Happy Hour,” Permit Carry-out Alcohol, and Establish New Liquor Liability Insurance Requirements
As of July 1, 2024, Indiana will no longer be on one of the unhappiest lists in the United States: U.S. States that ban happy hours. Throughout the 1980s, various states, including Indiana in 1985, banned happy hours, defined as a specific time during the day when alcoholic drinks are discounted for patrons. As such, […]
March 4, 2024
Corporate Transparency Act Series:  Is the CTA on “Pause”? 
On Friday, March 1, 2024, an Alabama federal district court issued its decision in National Small Business United v. Yellen, holding that the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) is unconstitutional. The plaintiffs argued that, in enacting the CTA, Congress exceeded the enumerated powers granted to it under the U.S. Constitution.  The federal government argued that […]
February 28, 2024
Corporate Transparency Act Series:  Why the CTA?
In a recent SKO Insider, we provided a quick introduction to the now-effective Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and promised more information about this new law.  Before going into the CTA’s requirements, we have fielded many questions that come down to “Why the CTA?” So let’s get that out of the way. In recent years the […]