A Member of Stoll Keenon Ogden’s Louisville office since 1995, Tom serves as Co-Chair of the Arbitration & Mediation practice. He is also part of the Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits practice.
Tom has earned multiple distinctions for his professional accomplishments and community contributions. He is a past President of the Louisville Bar Association and has been recognized by Chambers USA as a “Leader in Kentucky.” According to the publication, he is “an extremely professional lawyer who treats each of his clients as if they’re number one.” In 2011, for his efforts in creating Thomas Merton Square and success in other civic endeavors, he was named Louisville Peacemaker of the Year by the Interfaith Paths to Peace.
Arbitration & Mediation: Tom approaches all disputes with the goal of securing a fair and equitable course of action and works to guide all parties to an agreement, without the expense and delay of litigation.
Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits: With more than 20 years of experience in this field, Tom offers a full scope of services that range from arbitration of collective bargaining agreements to counseling on workers’ compensation matters. He is a frequent lecturer, trainer and writer on employment law topics.
Public Benefit Corporation Services: Tom advises existing Public Benefit Corporations on various aspects of governance and compliance. He also occupies a unique position in the community that enables him to counsel new and existing businesses as they explore whether B Corporation status is appropriate for their needs.
Alcohol & Hospitality: Tom helps clients understand and navigate labor and employment matters specific to the beverage, hotel and travel industries.
SKO represented a provider of specialty patient care equipment that sued a consultant and its consulting business after an agreed upon Asset Purchase Agreement and Consulting Agreement’s restrictive covenants had been violated by the consultant. The provider sued for both monetary damages and injunctive relief. The Jefferson Circuit Court granted the provider’s motion for a temporary injunction against the consultant under the Consulting Agreement, but denied the motion for a temporary injunction against the consultant under the Asset Purchase Agreement. Because the Asset Purchase Agreement provided greater injunctive protection, the provider filed an interlocutory appeal pursuant to CR 65.07. The Kentucky Court of Appeals agreed with the provider that the Jefferson Circuit Court had erred in denying injunctive relief under the Asset Purchase Agreement, and reversed the Jefferson Circuit Court’s decision on that issue. This was a notable decision because the standard of review for a party seeking interlocutory relief from a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a temporary injunction is a clear abuse of discretion.
Successfully represented a company and one of its executives against claims by plaintiff for alleged disability discrimination, retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. SKO represented the company during investigations by the Kentucky Commission on Human Rights and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. After the EEOC found no wrongdoing, the plaintiff filed claims in the Pulaski Circuit Court. After three years of litigation, we obtained summary judgment dismissing all claims. SKO then successfully represented the company on appeal. The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the Pulaski Circuit Court's order dismissing all claims and denied the Plaintiff's petition for a rehearing.